Finding the Pony… and Learning to See the Herd
Finding the Pony… and Learning to See the Herd
There's an old idea I've come back to often. Somewhere in every pile, there's a pony.
It's a simple image — but it points to something I think about a great deal in how we lead, and how we see.
We are not neutral observers. As humans, we are wired deeply for survival — scanning constantly for risk, for gaps, for what's missing, for what could go wrong. That instinct kept our ancestors alive. In modern organisations, left unexamined, it quietly becomes something else: constant problem-seeking, reactive rule-making, a tightening of control. We become extraordinarily skilled at finding what isn't working. And in doing so, we make ourselves blind to what is.
I noticed this in myself recently while working with a group of young people. My attention, as it so often does, went first to where guidance was needed, where things weren't quite aligning. Then something shifted.
I made a conscious effort to look instead for what was already working. Not superficially — but carefully, with the same attention I'd been giving to the gaps.
What I found wasn't a single pony. It was a herd.
Initiative being taken without prompting. Collaboration emerging naturally. Creative problem-solving happening in real time. Care for one another woven into action. Not perfectly. But consistently. And without being forced.
None of this happened by accident. From the beginning, the environment had been shaped with intention — clear guiderails rather than rigid rules, shared ownership rather than top-down direction, space to experiment within safe boundaries. The expectations were understood. But within those expectations, there was freedom. And that freedom mattered, because it allowed something to emerge that control never could: leadership chosen, not assigned.
This is where the deeper shift lies. Left to its own defaults, the mind asks: what's wrong here? Leadership — especially inside complex human systems — requires a different question: what's working here, and how do we do more of it?
That is not ignoring problems. It is rebalancing attention. And it turns out that what we focus on doesn't just reflect reality — it shapes it.
In this environment, something else became clear. Mistakes were not interruptions to progress. They were part of it. When the guiderails are right, mistakes become data, learning, momentum — something to understand rather than punish, sometimes even something to celebrate. Each one, met with reflection instead of reaction, builds capacity.
What I witnessed in those young people was not just participation. It was transformation. Not because they were directed into it — but because the conditions allowed it. And they became, quietly and in their own time, leaders.
The implication for organisations is significant. Many are still operating from a model built around guarding against failure, controlling behaviour, correcting deviations. But what if the path forward isn't more control? What if it's clearer direction, intentional guiderails, shared ownership — and a conscious shift in what we choose to see?
The real work is not just in changing systems. It is in changing attention.
Because when we do — we don't just find the pony. We realise it was never alone.